Articles Posted in

Published on:

By and

Many television broadcasters were left scratching their heads last month when a longtime waiver associated with the FCC’s emergency information accessibility rules expired on November 26.  That confusion was resolved today, when the Media Bureau granted the National Association of Broadcasters’ (“NAB”) request for a retroactive extension of the waiver of the “audible crawl” rule for inherently graphical non-textual information.

As we’ve previously detailed, the “audible crawl” rule requires TV stations and other video programming distributors to use a secondary audio stream to aurally present any emergency information that is presented visually (e.g., in an on-screen crawl) in non-newscast programming.  Ever since the rule went into effect on May 26, 2015, however, the FCC has granted a limited waiver for inherently graphical information—think Doppler radar and weather maps—acknowledging it is not yet technologically feasible for broadcasters to aurally convey such information.

On November 15, 2024, the National Association of Broadcasters (“NAB”) filed a Petition for Rulemaking asking the FCC to amend the rule and clarify that the requirement to audibly present inherently graphical non-textual emergency information applies only if a station is not already displaying a text crawl that shares the same or similar information depicted in the on-screen graphic (which the station would, under existing rules, be required to make aurally available).  The FCC issued a public notice seeking comment on NAB’s petition on November 25, 2024.  The public notice did not extend the existing waiver, which subsequently expired on November 26, leaving broadcasters to decide whether to continue airing such inherently graphical information without providing an audible crawl, or to cease airing such information altogether. Continue reading →

Published on:

By

One thing about being part of a heavily regulated industry—you know well in advance most of the regulatory obligations and deadlines you’ll be facing in the year ahead.  While that brings no solace to broadcasters, it does lend a certain level of predictability to an often unpredictable industry.

For more decades than most of us can remember, Pillsbury’s Communications Practice has published its annual Broadcasters’ Calendar detailing filing deadlines facing broadcasters in the coming year.  As the Calendar itself warns, however, these obligations can expand or contract (though expansion has unfortunately been the historical norm), and deadlines can appear, disappear, and move with great rapidity.

Broadcasters have therefore long known that you start the year with the Broadcasters’ Calendar close at hand, while keeping an eye on CommLawCenter and the industry trades to see what obligations and deadlines will be added, subtracted, or altered over the course of the year.

Thus it has been, and thus shall it always be.

Some years are more likely than others to bring surprises, however.  With Trump 2.0 arriving upon the scene and new leadership coming to the FCC in January, the winds of change are likely to blow particularly hard in 2025.  Broadcasters are hoping those winds will be at their backs, bringing long overdue deregulation before social media giants drive broadcasters over the same ledge that the remaining newspapers cling to by their fingertips.

While broadcasters are admittedly nervous regarding soon-to-be Chairman Carr’s comments about reinvigorating the public interest standard for broadcasters given that the phrase has lost all meaning under recent Commissions, his clarification that his focus rests primarily upon the national networks rather than local broadcasters has brought a limited degree of relief.  Still, broadcasters will need to keep a close eye on regulatory developments in 2025, which promises to be a very eventful year.

So keep the 2025 Broadcasters’ Calendar close at hand in the coming year, and hope that the 2026 edition will be appreciably thinner.

Published on:

By , , and

At its final Open Meeting of 2024, the FCC on December 11 adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) seeking comment on the elimination or updating of several rules applicable to broadcast stations, as well as other changes intended to clarify ambiguities and to make the rules consistent with current procedures.

The NPRM covers minor rule updates, including:

  • Replacing references to the Consolidated Database System (CDBS), with references to the Licensing Management System (LMS);
  • Updating Form Names;
  • Updating inconsistent terminology referring to the Table of Assignments/Allotments;
  • Removing obsolete television Incentive Auction rule language; and
  • Consolidating rules for petitions to deny under Section 73.3584.

The FCC is also proposing to codify existing Commission interpretations and practices into the rules.  For example, the NPRM proposes to:

  • Codify the current practice of interpreting Section 73.870(e) to mean that LPFM minor modification applications received on the same day will be treated as simultaneously filed;
  • Update Section 73.807 to reflect the existing interpretation of the term “authorized” station as including construction permittees in addition to licensees;
  • Codify when applicants for new NCE FM, NCE TV, or LPFM construction permits must give local public notice of their applications; and
  • Codify the existing interpretation of the “Signature Rule” (Section 73.3513) allowing “directors” of corporations to sign FCC applications, and to expand the universe of who may sign an FCC application on behalf of a corporation, partnership, or unincorporated association to include a “duly authorized employee.”

With respect to more substantive revisions, the NPRM is proposing to: Continue reading →

Published on:

By , and

Pillsbury’s communications lawyers have published the FCC Enforcement Monitor monthly since 1999 to inform our clients of notable FCC enforcement actions against FCC license holders and others.  This month’s issue includes:

  • Late License Application Leads to $8,500 Consent Decree for Digital Replacement Translator Licensee
  • Hawaii TV Station’s Late Uploads Lead to Proposed $20,000 Fine
  • Key West LPTV Station Faces $6,500 Fine for Failure to File a License Application and Unauthorized Operation

Indiana Broadcaster Agrees to $8,500 Consent Decree for Unauthorized Operation and Untimely License Applications

The FCC’s Media Bureau and the licensee of a Digital Replacement Translator (DRT) for a television station entered into a Consent Decree to resolve an investigation into whether the licensee failed to file a timely license application for the DRT and subsequently engaged in unauthorized operation of it.

Section 73.3598 of the FCC’s Rules specifies that construction permits are valid for three years and requires that a license application must be filed upon completion of construction.  Section 73.1745 of the Rules requires a station to hold an FCC license to operate.

In this case, the Media Bureau granted a DRT construction permit in November 2019, with an expiration date in November 2022.  However, upon completion of construction, the licensee failed to file a license to cover application.  The licensee began operating the DRT in March 2020, but explained that it overlooked filing the application due to an “administrative oversight” that coincided with the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.  The licensee did not file a license to cover application until June 2024, more than four years after it began operating the facility and a year and a half after the construction permit expired.

The licensee filed a petition for reconsideration asking that its construction permit be reinstated and requesting permission to file a late license application.  The licensee explained that the facility was operating and providing viewers in the area improved reception of local news programming.  It asserted that terminating operation of the DRT would therefore not serve the public interest.

Acknowledging that the licensee had a history of compliance with the FCC’s rules, the Bureau agreed to enter into a Consent Decree with the licensee under which the licensee admitted that its actions were willful and repeated violations of the FCC’s rules, it agreed to pay a civil penalty of $8,500, and it committed to implement a multi-part compliance plan, including appointing a compliance officer, creating a compliance manual, training its employees, and submitting annual compliance reports to the Commission until the grant of its next license renewal application. Continue reading →

Published on:

By

Back in May, I wrote about the Department of Labor’s new regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) significantly increasing the salary thresholds for an employee to be exempt from overtime pay requirements. The reason for writing about it in CommLawCenter is that media businesses rarely operate on a 9am-to-5pm schedule, and have many employees whose salaries fall within the range affected by these changes.

Continue reading →

Published on:

By , and

December 1 is the deadline for broadcast stations licensed to communities in Alabama, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Vermont to place their Annual EEO Public File Report in their Public Inspection File and post the report on their station website.

Under the FCC’s EEO Rule, all radio and television station employment units (“SEUs”), regardless of staff size, must afford equal opportunity to all qualified persons and practice nondiscrimination in employment.

In addition, those SEUs with five or more full-time employees (“Nonexempt SEUs”) must also comply with the FCC’s three-prong outreach requirements.  Specifically, Nonexempt SEUs must (i) broadly and inclusively disseminate information about every full-time job opening, except in exigent circumstances, (ii) send notifications of full-time job vacancies to referral organizations that have requested such notification, and (iii) earn a certain minimum number of EEO credits based on participation in various non-vacancy-specific outreach initiatives (“Menu Options”) suggested by the FCC, during each of the two-year segments (four segments total) that comprise a station’s eight-year license term.  These Menu Option initiatives include, for example, sponsoring job fairs, participating in job fairs, and having an internship program.

Nonexempt SEUs must prepare and place their Annual EEO Public File Report in the Public Inspection Files and on the websites of all stations comprising the SEU (if they have a website) by the anniversary date of the filing deadline for that station’s license renewal application.  The Annual EEO Public File Report summarizes the SEU’s EEO activities during the previous 12 months, and the licensee must maintain adequate records to document those activities.

For a detailed description of the EEO Rule and practical assistance in preparing a compliance plan, broadcasters should consult The FCC’s Equal Employment Opportunity Rules and Policies – A Guide for Broadcasters published by Pillsbury’s Communications Practice Group.

Deadline for the Annual EEO Public File Report for Nonexempt Radio and Television SEUs

Consistent with the above, December 1, 2024 is the date by which Nonexempt SEUs of radio and television stations licensed to communities in the states identified above, including Class A television stations, must (i) place their Annual EEO Public File Report in the Public Inspection Files of all stations comprising the SEU, and (ii) post the Report on the websites, if any, of those stations.  Once the new Report is posted on a station’s website, the prior year’s Report may be removed from that website. Continue reading →

Published on:

By , and

Pillsbury’s communications lawyers have published the FCC Enforcement Monitor monthly since 1999 to inform our clients of notable FCC enforcement actions against FCC license holders and others.  This month’s issue includes:

  • National Cable Sports Network Draws Proposed Fine of $146,976 for Transmitting False EAS Tones
  • For-Profit Arrangement Lands Michigan Noncommercial Radio Station in Hot Regulatory Water
  • California LPFM Station Agrees to $9,000 Consent Decree for Numerous Rule Violations

FCC Proposes $146,976 Fine Against National Cable Sports Network for Transmitting False EAS Tones

The Federal Communications Commission issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (NAL) to a cable sports network for violating the Commission’s Emergency Alert System (EAS) rules.  Specifically, the NAL alleged violations of Section 11.45 of the FCC’s Rules, which prohibits the transmission of false or deceptive EAS tones.

The EAS is a nationwide public warning system designed to alert the public in case of emergencies, such as severe weather warnings or AMBER alerts.  To maintain the effectiveness of such emergency alerts, EAS tones may only be aired for specific uses, such as actual emergencies, authorized tests, and qualified public service announcements (PSAs).  Section 11.45 strictly prohibits airing an EAS tone, or simulations of it, except in connection with these permitted uses.  The FCC takes false EAS tone violations particularly seriously, asserting that violations desensitize the public to legitimate EAS alerts.

In October 2023, the FCC received complaints alleging a cable network had transmitted EAS tones during a sports promotional video.  In January 2024, the Commission’s Enforcement Bureau sent a Letter of Inquiry requesting information about the incident.  The network responded, providing video recordings of the sports-related promo video that had aired for three days and admitting that it contained an EAS tone.  While the network argued the promo video contained fewer than two seconds of EAS tone, it did acknowledge that the tone was not aired in connection with an actual emergency, authorized test, qualified PSA, or other permitted use.  The network also acknowledged that the promo video aired six times over three days on two different networks.

Based on the network’s admissions and the FCC’s review of the video, the FCC found six apparent violations of Section 11.45 of the Commission’s Rules.  The FCC noted that while the two-second duration was shorter than a full EAS tone, it was long enough for viewers to recognize the sound as an EAS tone. Continue reading →

Published on:

By and

Following the devastation wrought by Hurricane Helene across the American southeast and in anticipation of Hurricane Milton’s arrival, the FCC has announced an extension of the deadline to upload Third Quarter Issues/Programs Lists for radio and television stations in states particularly affected by Hurricane Helene (note that the Public Notice mistakenly refers to them as “first quarter” Lists) .  As discussed in our Third Quarter Issues/Programs List advisory, the Lists are due for most stations by October 10, 2024.  However, in light of the Commission’s announcement today, broadcast stations in Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee now have until November 10, 2024 to upload these lists (the Public Notice actually says the October 10, 2020 deadline is extended to November 10, 2020, but the FCC’s intent is clear).

Because of Hurricane Helene, the FCC previously extended the deadline for broadcast stations nationwide (as well as all other EAS Participants) to file their Form One  in the EAS Test Reporting System.  The Form One, previously due on October 4, 2024, is now due on October 18, 2024.

In granting the latest extension only to stations in hurricane-impacted states, the FCC still encouraged those stations “to file their quarterly issues/programs lists as soon as practicable.”  The FCC also made clear that the extension “does not modify any requirements or filing deadlines related to stations’ political files, nor does it modify any other filing obligations or deadline related to broadcasters’ public files.”

Lastly, some practical advice—stations taking advantage of the Third Quarter Issues/Programs List extension should note in their upload file that they are filing after the normal deadline pursuant to an extension granted by the FCC.  When a station’s license comes up for renewal several years from now, and the licensee must certify that the Public File has been complete at all times, station employees may have forgotten why this particular filing appears to have been uploaded late.  It will be important for the station to have a contemporaneous note in the Public File explaining that the filing was not late, both to remind the licensee making its license renewal certification and to alert third parties and any FCC staff later reviewing the Public File that the List was in fact timely uploaded.

Published on:

By and

The next Quarterly Issues/Programs List (“Quarterly List”) must be placed in stations’ Public Inspection Files by October 10, 2024, reflecting information for the months of July, August, and September 2024.

Content of the Quarterly List

The FCC requires each broadcast station to air a reasonable amount of programming responsive to significant community needs, issues, and problems as determined by the station.  The FCC gives each station the discretion to determine which issues facing the community served by the station are the most significant and how best to respond to them in the station’s overall programming.

To demonstrate a station’s compliance with this public interest obligation, the FCC requires the station to maintain and place in the Public Inspection File a Quarterly List reflecting the “station’s most significant programming treatment of community issues during the preceding three month period.”  By its use of the term “most significant,” the FCC has noted that stations are not required to list all responsive programming, but only that programming which provided the most significant treatment of the issues identified.

Given that program logs are no longer mandated by the FCC, the Quarterly Lists may be the most important evidence of a station’s compliance with its public service obligations.  The lists also provide important support for the certification of Class A television station compliance discussed below.  We therefore urge stations not to “skimp” on the Quarterly Lists, and to err on the side of over-inclusiveness.  Otherwise, stations risk a determination by the FCC that they did not adequately serve the public interest during their license term.  Stations should include in the Quarterly Lists as much issue-responsive programming as they feel is necessary to demonstrate fully their responsiveness to community needs.  Taking extra time now to provide a thorough Quarterly List will help reduce risk at license renewal time.

The FCC has repeatedly emphasized the importance of the Quarterly Lists and often brings enforcement actions against stations that do not have complete Quarterly Lists in their Public Inspection File or which have failed to timely upload such lists when due.  The FCC’s base fine for missing Quarterly Lists is $10,000.

Preparation of the Quarterly List

The Quarterly Lists are required to be placed in the Public Inspection File by January 10, April 10, July 10, and October 10 of each year.  The next Quarterly List is required to be placed in stations’ Public Inspection Files by October 10, 2024, covering the period from July 1, 2024 through September 30, 2024. Continue reading →

Published on:

By , and

Pillsbury’s communications lawyers have published the FCC Enforcement Monitor monthly since 1999 to inform our clients of notable FCC enforcement actions against FCC license holders and others.  This month’s issue includes:

  • Massachusetts Man Ordered to Cease Using Interfering Home TV Antenna
  • Unauthorized Transfers of Arkansas Radio Stations Lead to $8,000 Consent Decree
  • STIR/SHAKEN Rule Violations End With $1,000,000 Consent Decree

Interference From Home TV Antenna Moves FCC to Action

The FCC’s Enforcement Bureau recently issued a Notification of Harmful Interference (Notification) directing a Massachusetts man to cease using an indoor digital TV antenna in his home.

Over a two-day period in April 2024, an agent of the FCC’s Boston field office investigated an interference complaint.  The agent determined that unauthorized radio emissions in the 813-817 MHz band were interfering with the Massachusetts State Police public safety communications system.  The agent ultimately tracked the interference to an indoor digital TV antenna located in a condominium.  His suspicions were confirmed when the interference ceased after the device was unplugged.

The Communications Act of 1934 requires devices operating on certain frequencies, including the 800 MHz band, to be licensed by the FCC.  Section 15.5(b) of the FCC’s Rules creates a limited exception to this restriction for low power devices where no harmful interference is caused.  Section 15.3(m) defines harmful interference as “[a]ny emission, radiation or induction that endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunications service….”

In September 2024, the Bureau sent a Notification warning to the condominium owner that the TV antenna was causing harmful interference in violation of FCC rules, and should he continue to operate it, he would be subject to severe penalties, including fines, seizure of the equipment, or even imprisonment.

The Notification directed the resident to respond to the FCC within 10 days to describe his operation of the antenna and the steps being taken to ensure no further interference is caused.  The FCC indicated it would then determine what enforcement action is warranted to ensure no future violations occur.

Unauthorized Transfers of Control of Arkansas Radio Stations Net $8,000 Consent Decree

The licensee of an AM station and three FM stations in Arkansas failed to obtain required FCC approvals before transferring the licensee’s voting stock from one trust to another, and then transferring a 50% controlling interest in the licensee from the second trust to an individual.  To resolve the investigation, the licensee entered into a Consent Decree with the FCC’s Media Bureau which required, among other things, payment of an $8,000 civil penalty. Continue reading →