Close

Articles Posted in Indecency

Updated:

The FCC Takes Its Indecency Case to the Supreme Court, But Without Enthusiasm

Caught between a rock and the Second Circuit, the FCC hesitantly took the defense of its indecency policy to the Supreme Court today. The FCC filed a petition seeking the Court’s review of the Second Circuit’s decisions in indecency cases involving Fox and ABC programs. Last year, the Second Circuit…

Updated:

A Look Ahead at 2011 Reveals an Interesting Year for Retrans, Renewals, and Indecency

Earlier this month we posted our 2011 Broadcasters Calendar on CommLawCenter as well as on our Pillsbury web page. We have been annually publishing the Broadcasters Calendar, which contains much information regarding broadcast station deadlines and legal requirements, for as long as I can recall. It has always been one…

Updated:

Indecency Ruling Changes the Game

In light of today’s decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit invalidating the FCC’s indecency policy, it would be hard to justify writing about anything else. From my first days as a young lawyer screening programs before they were aired (I still remember assessing the legalities…

Updated:

FCC Ups the Ante on Indecency and Fox Affiliates Are the Poker Chips

If you are a Fox affiliate, your fax machine (if you still have one) probably has a message on it from the FCC waiting for you, courtesy of the latest struggle between Fox and the FCC over indecency enforcement. In a Notice of Apparent Liability released today, the FCC states…

Updated:

Supreme Court Narrowly Rules in Favor of FCC’s “Fleeting Expletives” Ban

Court Ordered Remand May Force the Supreme Court to deal with the First Amendment Issue 4/28/2009 In a 5-4 decision released today, the Supreme Court upheld the FCC’s so-called “fleeting expletives” policy which bans the radio and television broadcast of single so-called four-letter words that are considered indecent. However, the…

Updated:

Reaffirmed Principles and New “Clarifications” of the FCC’s Obscenity, Indecency and Profanity Regulations and Policies

November 2006 In an effort to reduce the risk of reversal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the FCC successfully persuaded the Court to allow it to pull back and review four indecency decisions. Earlier this week, the FCC announced the outcome of that review.…

Updated:

Frequently Asked Questions About FCC Regulation of Obscenity, Indecency, and Profanity

By Kathryn R. Schmeltzer and Jarrett S. Taubman November 2006 Sample questions include: What is the source of the Commission’s authority to limit “obscene,” “indecent,” and “profane” program material? What FCC regulations prohibit “obscene” or “indecent” program material? What Commission regulations prohibit “profane” program material? What about the First Amendment?…

Updated:

Second Circuit Court of Appeals Remands Portion of March 2006 Indecency Decisions and FCC Seeks Comments

By Kathryn R. Schmeltzer, Clifford M. Harrington and Richard R. Zaragoza September 2006 FCC’s Office of Engineering and Technology Announces Schedule for Proceeding on Unlicensed Operation in the TV Broadcast Bands As we reported earlier, on March 6, 2006, the FCC released an Order in Complaints Regarding Various Television Broadcasts…