Search
Published on:
FCC Enforcement Monitor December 2024
Pillsbury’s communications lawyers have published the FCC Enforcement Monitor monthly since 1999 to inform our clients of notable FCC enforcement actions against FCC license holders and others. This month’s issue includes:
- Unauthorized Oregon Radio Station Transfers Yield $16,000 Penalty
- Consent Decree Over Upgrade of EAS Equipment Includes $1.1 Million Payment
- Chinese Video Doorbell Manufacturer Draws Proposed Fine of $734,872 for Equipment Authorization Rule Violations
All in the Family: Unauthorized Oregon Station Transfers Between Mother, Daughter, and Sisters Result in Consent Decree and $16,000 Civil Penalty
The licensee of an Oregon AM station and its companion FM translator entered into a Consent Decree with the FCC’s Media Bureau to resolve the Bureau’s investigation into unauthorized transfers of control of the stations. The Consent Decree follows a September 2024 Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (NAL) and requires the licensee to pay a $16,000 civil penalty.
Under Section 310(d) of the Communications Act and Section 73.3540 of the FCC’s Rules, voluntary transfers of control of a broadcast license require prior approval by the FCC. To determine whether control of a broadcast license has changed, the FCC considers “actual or legal control, direct or indirect control, negative or affirmative control, and de facto as well as de jure control.” An analysis of de facto control, which is analyzed by the FCC under a totality of the circumstances test, looks at, among other things, the exercise of control over a station’s programming, personnel, and finances. Surrendering control over programming, personnel, or finances transfers de facto control of a station. The de facto control analysis also considers whether the other person or entity in question has held itself out to the public, the station staff, or both as being in control of the station.
In 2014, the sole member of the licensee LLC entered into a purchase agreement to sell the station to her daughter. The agreement stipulated that the daughter would pay the purchase price through “sweat equity,” defined by the parties as providing accounting and administrative services. Between September 2016 and February 2021, the daughter delivered enough “sweat equity” services to satisfy the purchase price, after which the licensee LLC filed Articles of Organization with Oregon listing the daughter as the sole member/manager of the licensee LLC.
In October 2021, the mother and daughter amended the purchase agreement to acknowledge that the daughter had fully performed under the agreement, but that “the purpose of the Purchase Agreement has been frustrated by the mutual mistake of the Parties, who acknowledge that the sale and transfer of the FCC licensee and the Station[s’] FCC license[s] should have been subject to the prior approval by the FCC in accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 310 and regulations promulgated thereunder.” The amendment stated that transfer applications would be filed within ten business days of execution of the purchase agreement amendment, but the applications were not filed until February 2022. Continue reading →