Articles Posted in Advertising

Published on:

By

Proceeding Is Important to Electronic Media Content Producers, Television Stations, Advertisers, Educators, Electronics Manufacturers, and Privacy Experts.

On January 13, 2010, the FCC released an Order granting two requests for extension of time to file comments in response to the FCC’s Notice of Inquiry (“NOI”) in its “Empowering Parents and Protecting Children in an Evolving Media Landscape” proceeding. One of the requests was filed jointly by the Association of National Advertisers, the American Advertising Federation, the American Association of Advertising Agencies, the Direct Marketing Association, the Interactive Advertising Bureau, and the Promotion Marketing Association. The second was filed jointly by the Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative and the Children’s Advertising Review Unit of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc. These parties requested additional time to prepare their comments in light of the numerous issues raised in the NOI and the year-end holidays that fell in the middle of the comment period. The new date for filing Comments in the proceeding is February 24, 2010 and the new date for filing Reply Comments is March 26, 2010.

Continue reading →

Published on:

By

November 2009
On December 1, 2009, the FTC’s newly-revised Guides on Endorsements and Testimonials will become effective. Broadcasters, including their on-air talent, need to know when a claim is an endorsement/testimonial, what on-air disclosures may be required, and what their obligations are to ensure that claims are truthful and not misleading. These endorsement/testimonial-related issues can arise in a variety of contexts, including when station personnel voice commercials, prepare copy for advertisers, engage in banter regarding a product or service, serve as a spokesperson for an advertiser, or provide content to their station websites.

Continue reading →

Published on:

By

11/11/2009
In Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., 569 F.3d 946 (9th Cir. 2009), the Ninth Circuit held that unsolicited text messages to mobile phones sent by a retailer may constitute a “call” in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (the “TCPA”). This decision has sparked an increase in consumer class actions filed against retailers who send advertisements to consumers by text message.

The TCPA makes it unlawful “to make any call” using an automatic telephone dialing system (“ATDS”) to, among other things, a mobile telephone or pager. 47 U.S.C. Section 227(b)(1)(A). Congress enacted the TCPA in 1991, before text messaging was available, and intended it to prohibit automated voice calls from telemarketers to mobile phones. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., 569 F.3d 946 (9th Cir. 2009), extended this consumer protection to text calls made using ATDSs.

Continue reading →

Published on:

By

10/15/2009
On October 5, 2009, the Federal Trade Commission announced that it finalized the update to its Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising (the “Guides”), which have been in effect in their current form since 1980.1 The evolving practice of companies marketing their goods and services through bloggers and other “new media” received special attention.

The FTC’s changes now make explicit that the principles in the Guides apply to a company’s marketing of its products or services through third parties using “new media,” such as blogs and social networks, and that both advertisers and their “sponsored” endorsers have responsibility for the content of such endorsements as well as for disclosure of commercial links that consumers would not expect to exist between the advertiser and the endorser (such as payments or free products in exchange for a blog post containing a positive product review). The update also includes a couple of changes to the old rules, including the elimination of the safe harbor originally authorized under the 1980 Guides for ads with unrepresentative consumer testimonials–in most such ads now, including a disclaimer such as “results not typical” or “results may vary” will no longer be sufficient.

Continue reading →

Published on:

By

February 2006
Notwithstanding the fact that it has been over 35 years since Congress banned cigarette ads from the airwaves, broadcasters continue to ask for advice on whether they may air certain types of tobacco-related advertisements. In fact, questions in this area of law appear to be on the increase. One reason is the proliferation of small, independent cigarette manufacturers resulting from the 1998 tobacco settlement. That settlement has caused the price of cigarettes to rise, thereby making it profitable for small companies to become cigarette manufacturers. Given the pressure that these manufacturers and their retail outlets are likely to place on broadcasters to help in promoting these new tobacco products, we offer the following Q&A to aid broadcasters in complying with tobacco advertising restrictions should they be asked by any company to air tobacco-related spots… article continues